CASE 74Rule 2, Fair Sailing
Rule 11, On the Same Tack, Overlapped
There is no rule that dictates how the helmsman or crew of a leeward boat must sit; contact with a windward boat does not break rule 2 unless the helmsman’s or crew’s position is deliberately misused.
Summary of the Facts
W was overtaking L in sub-planing conditions on a fine reach. L luffed slightly,
the helmsman’s back making contact with W just forward of the shroud. At this
point the hulls were about an arm’s length apart. Neither boat accepted a 720°
Turns Penalty. At the subsequent hearing, the protest committee disqualified
L under rule 2, stating that W was correctly trimmed with full sails and her
crew sitting by the leeward shroud. ‘Contact’, it continued, ‘could only have
been made if L’s helmsman was sitting out flat.’ In the prevailing conditions
this was significantly beyond the normal sailing position required.’ L appealed.
Decision
Appeal upheld; L is reinstated and W disqualified under rule 11. In Case 73
it is clear that L’s crew deliberately touched W with the intention of protesting
her out of the race. In this case there was no such deliberate action by L.
There is no rule that dictates how a helmsman or crew must sit and, in the absence
of deliberate misuse of his positioning, no breach of rule 2 took place.
RYA 1993/2